Ethical creation and use of AI technologies within Givaudan

Translucent mesh fabric drapes softly, revealing a textured, grid-like pattern. The background features a calming blue hue, creating a serene atmosphere.
  • Summary
  • Givaudan’s principles
  • Our Policy
  • Our downloadable Policy
  • Structured intelligence content
Component content

Givaudan is committed to scaling AI responsibly by establishing clear guardrails that align with ethical principles and regulatory standards, and Givaudan values. This policy defines a binding corporate code of conduct for the ethical use, development, and deployment of AI systems, ensuring accountability and transparency in their operation; it should be respected in conjunction with all relevant global Givaudan policies and all relevant local legislations.

Givaudan’s principles
Component content

Givaudan’s principles

The concept of Responsible AI (as defined below) encompasses the development and procurement of AI systems that are not only technically robust but also ethical, transparent, and understandable. It emphasises the integration of trust and equitable outcomes into the development of AI capabilities. It also encompasses the use of AI systems by Givaudan employees.

Two women sit together on a light-coloured sofa, smiling as they look at a laptop screen. One wears a dark sleeveless top, while the other is in a blue long-sleeved top. The mood is relaxed and collaborative.

Our policy is built on the following nine key principles:

Safety - Reliability - Security - Privacy - Fairness - Transparency - Explainability - Accountability

Responsible prompting

In a specific AI system, not all these principles can be implemented at maximum. For instance, there might be a compromise between privacy and transparency. The weighting of the principles varies depending on the purpose of the system, its users, and the context.

The business and IT owners of a specific AI system are responsible for making this compromise. For instance, a certain group of users might favour a principle over another of the list. These compromises must be documented and, if there is any doubt, they must be discussed with the AI Governance Board for validation (this weighting principle is inspired by the Data Science Swiss Federal guidelines).

With the use of ‘must’, the following sections define the minimum requirements for each principle, whereas ’should’ defines the maximum.

Givaudan will assess the risk linked to each AI system. This assessment will respect the risk classifications of the local regulations where our AI systems are used and operated.

AI systems assessed ‘high risk’ (whether bought or made), because of their potential impact, may have specific extra constraints listed in the following sections.

Our Policy
Component content
Our downloadable Policy
Component content

Our Policy

Downloadable in English

Structured intelligence content
Component content

Full policy text

10/07/2026